Brookings Institution: Frontier AI regulation – preparing for the future beyond ChatGPT
A Collaborative Approach to AI Governance
Overview
AI is too important not to regulate, and too important not to regulate well.
Policymakers from Brussels to Washington, DC to California to the United Nations are all proposing new governance frameworks for how AI can be developed and deployed within specific countries and even specific states. The governance decisions we make today about how to develop, deploy, use, or limit AI will have an impact on how our communities and economies function for generations. To ensure the opportunities of AI are widely accessible to all, government, industry, and civil society need to work together to build expertise, share learnings, and advance solutions.
Digital Futures Project with support from Google.org
As part of the Digital Futures Project, Google.org established a fund to provide grants to leading think tanks and academic institutions around the world to facilitate dialogue and inquiry into this important technology. Researchers' views are independent and intended to advance public understanding of these issues. Google does not endorse any specific proposals or recommendations.
As global regulatory debates continue to unfold, researchers are working to shed light on two big governance challenges facing policymakers:
- How to regulate AI in a way that keeps pace with the evolution of the technology; and
- How to effectively govern a foundational technology like AI in which oversight spans a network of governments, regulatory and multistakeholder bodies around the globe.
In our opinion, none of the existing initiatives can address the challenges of maximizing the opportunities of AI while identifying and minimizing the risks alone… especially where there is still much to learn about AI. Understanding risks and putting shared principles into practice will require thoughtful implementation through myriad use cases.
The importance of regulations that can keep pace with AI’s evolution
Effective AI governing models require a different approach to regulation - one that can keep pace with the rate at which the technology changes. To ensure the continued safe integration of AI, governance frameworks and approaches must be flexible; and policymakers and leaders must be proactive in updating these frameworks as the technology continues to evolve.
The challenges that AI presents are too multifaceted, the relevant actors too varied, and the geopolitical situation too complicated for any one global body to tackle by itself.
The benefits of a decentralized AI governing model
AI’s foundational nature touches nearly every industry and sector, making it difficult for a single governing body to have authority over the technology. Researchers have identified the need for regulatory harmonization and common standards across jurisdictions as part of a broader approach to governance.
Supported research on AI governance
To help inform how governments are thinking about regulating AI, the Digital Futures Project funded research that explores the benefits and implications of different approaches to AI governance. Learn more about the research and recommendations below.
-
Sep 14, 2024
-
Mar 06, 2024
Carnegie: Charting geopolitics and european governance of AI
-
Feb 26, 2024
Brookings Institution: Should the UN govern global AI?
-
Mar 11, 2024
Brookings Institution: How to build cooperation on critical international standards
-
Feb 12, 2024
CSIS: Book Talk: "Digital Empires: The Global Battle to Regulate Technology"
-
Feb 02, 2024
CSIS: Nippon Steel, TTC, and Digital Trade
-
Jan 26, 2024
CSIS: The State of Trade and Technology Policy Entering 2024
-
Jan 30, 2024
Carnegie: How the EU Can Navigate the Geopolitics of AI
-
Jul 23, 2024
Carnegie: Emerging Consensus and Key Questions for Foundation AI Model Governance
-
Mar 11, 2024
Brookings Institution: How to build cooperation on critical international standards
-
Feb 15, 2024
Brookings Institution: Fairness in machine learning: Regulation or standards?
-
Jan 10, 2024
Brookings Institution: A roadmap for a US-China AI dialogue
-
Dec 08, 2024
Brookings Institution: Insights from the WEF AI Governance Summit
-
Jan 24, 2024
CSIS: Discussion: Global Technology Competition in the Age of AI
-
Jan 11, 2024
CSIS: Korea’s Move to Ex Ante Competition Regulation Discriminates against U.S. Business
-
Jan 11, 2024
CSIS: Prospects for Digital Trade in the Asia-Pacific in 2024
-
Aug 27, 2024
Carnegie: The Future of International Scientific Assessments of AI’s Risks
-
Sep 13, 2024
Carnegie: If-Then Commitments for AI Risk Reduction
-
Mar 21, 2024
Carnegie: Envisioning a Global Regime Complex to Govern Artificial Intelligence
-
Mar 21, 2024
CSIS: Surveying the Future of U.S. Open Foundation Model Policy
-
Feb 15, 2024
CSIS: Italy’s AI and Technology Policy Under its G7 Presidency
-
Sep 25, 2024
R Street: US May Be Losing the Race for Global AI Leadership
-
Jul 25, 2024
Brookings Institution: What does the 2024 election mean for the future of AI governance?
-
Aug 29, 2024
Brookings Institution: The good, the not-so-good, and the ugly of the UN’s blueprint for AI
-
Feb 27, 2024
Carnegie: Tracing the Roots of China’s AI Regulations
-
Mar 15, 2024
Brookings Institution: Digital economy: Foresight Africa 2024